The "Four Strands of Science Learning" is an effective way to promote inquiry in the classroom. I really enjoyed reading about the biodiversity field study that the two fifth grade classes worked on throughout the school year. Not only was this project inquiry-based in the way that the students were asking questions and investigating those questions, but it also integrated other subjects into the content, as well as connecting different areas of science. In school, students are mostly taught one area of science at a time and make little connections between the different areas. This is unrealistic because in the "real world" students will ask questions about the world around them which integrate all areas of science, which is why I agree with the "Four Strands of Science Learning." This chapter also is similar to the EPE "scientists' science" from the Gunckel article but instead of starting with questions and working towards an explanation, the students are given an explanation first.
In the four strands, the students participate in science, reflect on scientific knowledge, generate scientific evidence, and understand scientific explanations. However, something that I do not agree with is the order that the four strands fall in. Instead of strand one being students participating in science, strand 1 begins with scientific explanations. I believe that students should explore science before being given the explanations so that they are not simply memorizing definitions, but searching for answers for their own questions. This makes the students' learning more meaningful and interesting since they are finding answers rather than being given an explanation and then practicing a theory.
I completely agree with you when you discuss the importance of inquiry. I think it is very evident how important inquiry in the beginning stages of learning. Kindergarten students are so eager to learn new things and are constantly asking why; which is a great indication that inquiry should be a part of our curriculum. I also agree with your comment that the 4 stands should are all good, but would work much better if in a different order. Any science investigation should begin with inquiry, as it motivated the students investigation and exploration. It is a great way to promote self motivation to learn!
ReplyDelete